Get a Free Quote

Utah Level-Funded vs Fully Insured
Savings Calculator

Compare level-funded and fully insured health plan costs for your Utah business. See potential savings, surplus refunds, and worst-case scenarios -- powered by Utah-specific carrier data and actuarial benchmarks.

Utah Level-Funded Market at a Glance

Avg FI Premium PEPM
$610/mo
LF Savings Potential
15% avg
Cost vs National Avg
-15%
LF Market
Competitive
Min Group Size: 2 employees
Surplus Return: 55-80% of unused claims fund
LF Carriers: UnitedHealthcare Level-Funded, Cigna Level-Funded, Aetna Funding Advantage
Mandates: Minimal state mandates beyond ACA requirements
1
Your Company
Tell us about your Utah business so we can model level-funded vs fully insured costs using Utah-specific rates and carrier data.
38
60%
20%
20%
2
Current Plan & Level-Funded Model
Enter your current fully insured costs and configure the level-funded model parameters. We'll show a side-by-side comparison using Utah-specific data.
10%
70%
15%

Level-Funded Health Insurance in Utah: What Employers Need to Know

Utah has among the lowest health insurance costs in the nation, driven by the state's young population demographics, below-average utilization patterns, and competitive provider market. The cost index of 0.85 reflects costs that are 15% below the national average. These favorable demographics make Utah one of the best states for level-funded health plans, as the young workforce translates to lower expected claims and more predictable cost outcomes.

SelectHealth (owned by Intermountain Healthcare) dominates the fully insured market, with Regence, UnitedHealthcare, and Cigna also competing. The level-funded space is served by national carriers, with competitive terms driven by Utah's favorable demographics. The minimum group size is typically 2 employees, and surplus return provisions are among the most generous in the country at 55-80% of unused claims funds.

Utah's technology sector, centered in the Silicon Slopes area south of Salt Lake City, includes many high-growth companies that are ideal candidates for level-funded plans. The state's Department of Insurance treats level-funded plans as self-funded under ERISA and has not imposed additional regulations. Utah employers with young, healthy workforces can often see 15-20% savings by switching from fully insured to level-funded arrangements.

Frequently Asked Questions: Level-Funded Plans in Utah

Is level-funded health insurance available in Utah? +
Yes. Utah employers have access to level-funded health plans from carriers including UnitedHealthcare Level-Funded, Cigna Level-Funded, Aetna Funding Advantage. The minimum group size is typically 2 employees. Level-funded plans in Utah are treated as self-funded under ERISA, providing flexibility in plan design and potential savings.
How much can Utah employers save with level-funded? +
Based on Utah's average fully insured PEPM of $610 and typical level-funded discounts of 15%, employers can expect meaningful savings in the expected claims scenario. Best-case savings with surplus refunds can reach 20-30%, while worst-case exposure is capped by stop-loss insurance.
What happens if claims are higher than expected? +
Stop-loss insurance protects against catastrophic claims. Individual specific stop-loss covers any single claimant above the attachment point (e.g., $50,000). Aggregate stop-loss caps total group claims at 125% of expected. Your maximum exposure is predetermined and contractually limited.
What if claims are lower than expected? +
This is where level-funded shines. If your group's claims are below the funded amount, you receive a surplus refund. In Utah, typical surplus return provisions are 55-80% of unused claims fund. With fully insured plans, the carrier keeps the difference.
Which Utah employers are the best fit for level-funded? +
Level-funded plans work best for Utah employers with 2-250 employees, younger-than-average workforces, and a desire for cost transparency. Industries with lower claims risk (technology, professional services, education) often see the best results. The Utah market is classified as competitive for level-funded options.

Built on Real Data -- Not Guesswork

This calculator uses Utah-specific actuarial data, carrier rate filings, and published survey benchmarks.

📊

KFF Employer Survey

2025 benchmarks from 2,000+ employers on premiums, plan design, and funding type distribution

📋

SOA Claims Tables

Society of Actuaries group health experience studies for expected claims modeling by age and industry

📈

Stop-Loss Rate Data

Sun Life and Voya reference rate schedules for specific and aggregate stop-loss pricing by attachment point

🏗

Utah DOI Filings

State-level rate filings, carrier market share data, and regulatory requirements from Utah's insurance department

Want a Custom Level-Funded Quote for Utah?

Get a side-by-side comparison with actual carrier quotes from UnitedHealthcare Level-Funded, Cigna Level-Funded, Aetna Funding Advantage -- reviewed by a benefits advisor who knows the Utah market.

Calculation Methodology

Fully Insured Cost: Current PEPM x number of employees x 12 months. Projected forward using the annual renewal increase rate.

Level-Funded Breakdown:
- Claims Fund: PEPM x claims ratio x state cost index (0.85 for Utah) x age factor x industry adjustment x plan tier multiplier. This is held in a claims account to pay medical expenses.
- Admin Fee: PEPM x admin percentage. Covers TPA fees, network access, compliance, and reporting.
- Stop-Loss Premium: Based on attachment point selected. Adjusted by Utah's stop-loss factor (0.88) and group demographics.
- Total Level-Funded: Claims Fund + Admin Fee + Stop-Loss Premium.

Scenario Modeling:
- Best Case: Actual claims at 55% of expected. Employer receives ~50% of surplus (unused claims fund) as a refund.
- Expected Case: Actual claims match the expected claims fund. Typical savings vs fully insured.
- Worst Case: Claims run 130% of expected, but stop-loss caps total exposure at 125% of expected claims fund.

State Cost Index: Utah's index of 0.85 adjusts base claims for state-level provider costs, utilization patterns, and regulatory environment. Based on CMS Geographic Practice Cost Index and Utah DOI rate filings.

Data Sources: SOA Group Health Experience Study, Mercer National Survey 2025, KFF 2025 Employer Health Benefits Survey, TrustMark/Voya level-funded reference data, Sun Life stop-loss rate manuals, NAIC stop-loss model regulations, CMS Federal Age Rating Curves, Utah Department of Insurance filings.