Get a Free Quote

Washington Level-Funded vs Fully Insured
Savings Calculator

Compare level-funded and fully insured health plan costs for your Washington business. See potential savings, surplus refunds, and worst-case scenarios -- powered by Washington-specific carrier data and actuarial benchmarks.

Washington Level-Funded Market at a Glance

Avg FI Premium PEPM
$710/mo
LF Savings Potential
11% avg
Cost vs National Avg
+2%
LF Market
Competitive
Min Group Size: 2 employees
Surplus Return: 45-70% of unused claims fund
LF Carriers: UnitedHealthcare Level-Funded, Cigna Level-Funded, Aetna Funding Advantage
Mandates: ACA plus state mandates for autism, hearing aids, neurodevelopmental therapy, and reproductive services
1
Your Company
Tell us about your Washington business so we can model level-funded vs fully insured costs using Washington-specific rates and carrier data.
38
60%
20%
20%
2
Current Plan & Level-Funded Model
Enter your current fully insured costs and configure the level-funded model parameters. We'll show a side-by-side comparison using Washington-specific data.
10%
70%
15%

Level-Funded Health Insurance in Washington: What Employers Need to Know

Washington state has a competitive health insurance market with strong regional carriers and growing level-funded adoption. The cost index of 1.02 is slightly above the national average, influenced by higher provider costs in the Seattle metro area. Washington has moderate state-specific benefit mandates, including coverage for autism services, hearing aids, and neurodevelopmental therapy, which can create cost advantages for level-funded plans under ERISA preemption.

Premera Blue Cross and Regence Blue Shield are the dominant fully insured carriers, with Kaiser Permanente also having a significant presence. For level-funded arrangements, UnitedHealthcare, Cigna, and Aetna provide the primary options. The Seattle-Tacoma metro area has the most competitive carrier landscape, while eastern Washington has fewer options but can still access national carrier products.

Washington runs its own state exchange (Washington Healthplanfinder) and has been proactive in health care reform, including enacting a public option for the individual market. These reforms primarily affect the individual and small-group fully insured markets and have limited direct impact on employer-sponsored level-funded plans. Washington's Office of the Insurance Commissioner treats level-funded plans as self-funded under ERISA, though the state has shown interest in understanding how level-funded arrangements affect the small-group risk pool.

Frequently Asked Questions: Level-Funded Plans in Washington

Is level-funded health insurance available in Washington? +
Yes. Washington employers have access to level-funded health plans from carriers including UnitedHealthcare Level-Funded, Cigna Level-Funded, Aetna Funding Advantage. The minimum group size is typically 2 employees. Level-funded plans in Washington are treated as self-funded under ERISA, providing flexibility in plan design and potential savings.
How much can Washington employers save with level-funded? +
Based on Washington's average fully insured PEPM of $710 and typical level-funded discounts of 11%, employers can expect meaningful savings in the expected claims scenario. Best-case savings with surplus refunds can reach 20-30%, while worst-case exposure is capped by stop-loss insurance.
What happens if claims are higher than expected? +
Stop-loss insurance protects against catastrophic claims. Individual specific stop-loss covers any single claimant above the attachment point (e.g., $50,000). Aggregate stop-loss caps total group claims at 125% of expected. Your maximum exposure is predetermined and contractually limited.
What if claims are lower than expected? +
This is where level-funded shines. If your group's claims are below the funded amount, you receive a surplus refund. In Washington, typical surplus return provisions are 45-70% of unused claims fund. With fully insured plans, the carrier keeps the difference.
Which Washington employers are the best fit for level-funded? +
Level-funded plans work best for Washington employers with 2-250 employees, younger-than-average workforces, and a desire for cost transparency. Industries with lower claims risk (technology, professional services, education) often see the best results. The Washington market is classified as competitive for level-funded options.

Built on Real Data -- Not Guesswork

This calculator uses Washington-specific actuarial data, carrier rate filings, and published survey benchmarks.

📊

KFF Employer Survey

2025 benchmarks from 2,000+ employers on premiums, plan design, and funding type distribution

📋

SOA Claims Tables

Society of Actuaries group health experience studies for expected claims modeling by age and industry

📈

Stop-Loss Rate Data

Sun Life and Voya reference rate schedules for specific and aggregate stop-loss pricing by attachment point

🏗

Washington DOI Filings

State-level rate filings, carrier market share data, and regulatory requirements from Washington's insurance department

Want a Custom Level-Funded Quote for Washington?

Get a side-by-side comparison with actual carrier quotes from UnitedHealthcare Level-Funded, Cigna Level-Funded, Aetna Funding Advantage -- reviewed by a benefits advisor who knows the Washington market.

Calculation Methodology

Fully Insured Cost: Current PEPM x number of employees x 12 months. Projected forward using the annual renewal increase rate.

Level-Funded Breakdown:
- Claims Fund: PEPM x claims ratio x state cost index (1.02 for Washington) x age factor x industry adjustment x plan tier multiplier. This is held in a claims account to pay medical expenses.
- Admin Fee: PEPM x admin percentage. Covers TPA fees, network access, compliance, and reporting.
- Stop-Loss Premium: Based on attachment point selected. Adjusted by Washington's stop-loss factor (1.02) and group demographics.
- Total Level-Funded: Claims Fund + Admin Fee + Stop-Loss Premium.

Scenario Modeling:
- Best Case: Actual claims at 55% of expected. Employer receives ~50% of surplus (unused claims fund) as a refund.
- Expected Case: Actual claims match the expected claims fund. Typical savings vs fully insured.
- Worst Case: Claims run 130% of expected, but stop-loss caps total exposure at 125% of expected claims fund.

State Cost Index: Washington's index of 1.02 adjusts base claims for state-level provider costs, utilization patterns, and regulatory environment. Based on CMS Geographic Practice Cost Index and Washington DOI rate filings.

Data Sources: SOA Group Health Experience Study, Mercer National Survey 2025, KFF 2025 Employer Health Benefits Survey, TrustMark/Voya level-funded reference data, Sun Life stop-loss rate manuals, NAIC stop-loss model regulations, CMS Federal Age Rating Curves, Washington Department of Insurance filings.