All case studies
Case Study

How a Growing Construction Company Added $98K+ in Annual Value to Strengthen Its Sale Position

TL;DR
Value added
$98K+/yr
Annual value added to sale position
Premium savings
30–50%
Premium savings vs age-banded
HR reclaimed
10+ hrs/wk
HR admin time recovered

Company Profile: A 26-person construction company based in the upper Midwest, specializing in commercial and residential projects. The owner was focused on building enterprise value over the next 3-5 years, with an eventual sale or partnership as the end goal.

The ACA compliance risk in informal individual reimbursements ahead of a 3–5 year sale

  • Non-compliant benefits practices: The company had been informally reimbursing select employees for individual health coverage — a practice that violates ACA employer mandate rules and creates significant liability exposure during due diligence.
  • No formal benefits structure: Without a consistent, documented benefits program, the company faced both compliance risk and difficulty demonstrating clean operations to potential buyers or investors.
  • High employee turnover in a tight labor market: The company was losing an average of 4 employees per year, with key project managers and estimators each generating approximately $2M in annual revenue. Every departure represented a direct hit to revenue continuity and company valuation.
  • Hidden HR costs: The owner's office manager was spending 10+ hours per week on manual HR tasks — payroll, onboarding paperwork, compliance tracking — time that represented an invisible but real drag on operational efficiency.
  • Workers' comp complexity: As a construction firm with multiple class codes (road construction, superintendent, clerical, executive), managing workers' compensation was administratively burdensome and costs were unpredictable year-over-year.

What a compliant benefits + HR + workers’ comp structure required for sale readiness

  • A compliant, documented employee benefits program that would withstand buyer due diligence
  • Reduced total cost of employee-related overhead (benefits + admin + turnover)
  • Predictable, budgetable benefits costs that improve financial forecasting
  • Bundled HR administration to reduce headcount overhead
  • Workers' compensation management with pay-as-you-go billing
  • A scalable solution that grows with the company without requiring an internal HR department

Six funding paths modeled: Taft-Hartley vs PEO vs captive vs level-funded

1. Traditional (Fully Covered)

Projected cost: Age-banded individual market rates; older employees (avg. age 35-38) facing premiums of $650-$900+/month

Limitations: Costs tied directly to employee demographics. Annual renewals unpredictable (industry average 8-12% increases). No bundled HR or payroll. Does not address compliance gaps or reduce administrative overhead. From a buyer's perspective, traditional plans represent a volatile, non-optimized cost structure.

✗ Does not address the core valuation objective

2. Taft Hartley plan

Projected cost: Flat-rate premiums starting at ~$471/month per employee regardless of age

Projected savings: Older employees could save 30-50% on premiums vs. age-banded plans

Strengths: Non-experience-rated premiums, national BCBS PPO network, Gold-level benefits (lower deductibles, lower out-of-pocket maximums). Historically stable 2-3% renewals create a predictable line item for financial projections.

Limitations: Union association requirements (minimum wage thresholds, holiday requirements). Does not bundle workers' comp or full HR administration.

◐ Strong option, but doesn't fully address bundled HR + workers' comp needs

3. Self-Funded / Level-Funded

Assessment: At 26 employees, the group is too small for standalone self-funding without taking on significant claims volatility risk. A single catastrophic claim could create a major balance sheet event — exactly the kind of unpredictability that suppresses valuation multiples.

✗ Not appropriate at current headcount — revisit at 75-100+ employees

4. PEO (Professional Employer Organization) ✓ Selected

PEO admin fee: ~$22,000/year (flat per-employee-per-week model — no percentage-of-payroll surprises)

Employer health contribution: ~$48,000/year (based on ~$200/month per employee minimum)

Health network: National PPO with 1.5M+ providers — chosen for superior provider access in the company's region

Workers' comp: Bundled with pay-as-you-go billing, eliminating year-end audit surprises

HR services: Payroll, onboarding, compliance management, OSHA support, I-9 verification — all handled by a dedicated service team

Projected Annual ROI

When we ran Total Wall's numbers through our Benefits ROI Calculator, the full PEO value breakdown looked like this:

Impact AreaAnnual ValueHow Calculated
Reduced turnover (4 → 2 employees/year)$98,7002 fewer departures (1.5 typical + 0.5 high-value)
High-value talent attraction$2,000,0001 extra high-value hire × $2M incremental revenue
Faster hiring (45 → 30 days)$23,62515 days saved × 7 hires
Improved productivity (85% → 90%)$67,294+5.9% productivity across 22 employees
HR admin time recovered (10 hrs/week)$35,10010 hrs/wk × $50/hr × 52 wks + 35% opportunity cost
Compliance risk reduction$10,0002 active risks eliminated (OSHA, handbook)
Workers' comp savings$9,66035% savings on $27,600 premium
Replaced tools & admin savings$1,320Payroll + 1 HR tool consolidated into PEO
Gross Annual Value
$2,245,699
PEO Investment
$21,935/yr
$81.24/employee/month
Net Annual ROI
$2,223,764
10,238% return on investment

Base Case scenario (100% of projected improvements). Conservative = 70%, Optimistic = 130%. Generated by BusinessInsurance.Health Benefits ROI Calculator. Data sources: KFF 2024, SHRM, BLS JOLTS, MetLife, Willis Towers Watson, Work Institute.

Why Taft-Hartley + bundled HR + pay-as-you-go workers’ comp delivered the $98K+ value lift

The owner chose the PEO solution not because it was the cheapest option on paper — it wasn't. The Taft Hartley plan would have produced lower monthly premium costs. But the decision was never just about premiums. When we ran the full analysis, the PEO delivered $2.2M+ in projected annual value — a 10,238% return on the $21,935 investment — by addressing turnover, talent attraction, productivity, compliance, and admin overhead simultaneously.

The Business Valuation Math Told a Different Story

When we ran this company through our Business Valuation Tool, the numbers were clear. With ~$500K in annual EBITDA and a 3.2x industry multiple (BizBuySell range: 2.5x-4.0x for businesses under $5M), the current valuation sat at approximately $1.27M. But the tool flagged a critical risk:

Biggest Valuation Risk

"No/minimal benefits" was costing an estimated -$90,000 in lost value

Poor benefits = high turnover risk = lower valuation

After addressing HR infrastructure gaps across 10 risk categories — compliance, workers' comp, benefits, payroll, documentation, retention, training, multi-state, time tracking, and EPLI — the projected 12-month valuation increased to:

$1.54M (+$266,000)

A 20.9% increase in enterprise value and a +0.66x improvement in the valuation multiple — driven by professionalizing the company's HR infrastructure through the PEO solution.

📅 Estimated Value Growth Timeline

$1.34M
+$66,500
3 Months
$1.40M
+$133,000
6 Months
$1.47M
+$199,500
9 Months
$1.54M
+$266,000
12 Months

They look for:

  • Clean compliance: The PEO eliminated the non-compliant reimbursement practice and assumed co-employer liability for HR compliance, I-9s, and OSHA — reducing the legal risk profile that suppresses offers during due diligence.
  • Predictable operating costs: The flat per-employee-per-week admin fee replaced a messy patchwork of individual vendor relationships. For financial modeling purposes, every employee-related cost became a clean, predictable line item.
  • Reduced key-person risk: By cutting turnover in half and providing Fortune 500-level benefits in a blue-collar industry, the company reduced its dependency on any single employee — a factor that directly impacts valuation multiples.
  • Scalable infrastructure: The PEO platform provided payroll, HR, benefits, and compliance management that scales automatically as the company grows from 26 to 50+ employees — without requiring an in-house HR hire ($100K-$150K/year).

The bottom line: Two separate analyses told the same story. Our Business Valuation Tool projected a $266,000 increase in enterprise value within 12 months — from $1.27M to $1.54M — by addressing 10 risk categories including "no/minimal benefits" (the single largest risk factor at -$90,000 in lost value). Our Benefits ROI Calculator then quantified the operational impact: $2.2M+ in annual value from reduced turnover, high-value talent attraction, productivity gains, compliance risk elimination, and workers' comp savings — all for a $21,935/year PEO investment. The cost of the solution didn't just pay for itself; it transformed the company's operating profile and exit readiness.

Want this kind of result for your business?

A 30-minute discovery call models all six funding options against your actual situation. No pitch deck — just numbers you can defend in a board meeting.

Book a discovery call →

What other owners can take from this

This case shows that benefits and structure are not just a cost line, they affect what a company is worth. Strengthening the program in ways that improve retention and reduce risk can lift the durable earnings and stability a buyer pays for.

Any owner thinking about a future sale can apply the same lens: treat benefits decisions as valuation decisions, and start early enough that the improvements show up in the trailing earnings a buyer reviews.

When this approach tends to fit:

For broader context on employer benefits, see SHRM's benefits and compensation resources.

To explore the same approach for your own numbers, try the Business Valuation Tool or the Benefits ROI Calculator.

Frequently asked questions

How do benefits affect company value?

Through retention and risk. A stable, well-covered, compliant workforce supports the durable earnings and lower risk that drive valuation multiples.

When should I start?

Earlier than most owners do, because improvements take time to show up in the trailing earnings a buyer reviews.

How do I estimate the effect?

Model how retention and stability changes shift a valuation range for your business.

Reviewed by Sam Newland, CFP, Founder of Benefitra. Last updated June 2026.